Lake Tahoe compromise bill to win final committee approval Thursday
May 22, 2013
The compromise legislation repealing Nevada’s threatened withdrawal from the TRPA will be passed out of the Assembly Government Affairs Committee Thursday, Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick said.
The measure containing amended language developed between Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval and California Gov. Jerry Brown and lawmakers from both states not only pulls back Nevada’s threat to withdraw from the bistate compact, but agrees that both states will work to implement new regional compact rules developed over the past 18 months and partner into the future on protecting Lake Tahoe — while also committing to include economic conditions in developing and adopting rules at the lake.
Another key provision in the amended Senate Bill 229 is the law would establish a burden of proof for anyone challenging the regional plan or TRPA Governing Board decisions, said Gerald Gardner, Sandoval’s chief of staff.
The Assembly Government Affairs Committee’s hearing Wednesday in Carson City on the bill came a day after the two governors announced a renewed bistate partnership to restore Lake Tahoe.
“Their agreement will allow the local communities in both states to better manage the lake and conserve its natural splendor and the many species that make their home in the basin.”
Sen. Harry Reid
Gardner said the agreement “underscored the commitment of both states to work together to do what is best for the Tahoe Basin.”
He said that includes pledging to support the newly developed regional plan, even though it’s currently being challenged in court by the Sierra Club.
TRPA’s new regional plan not only recognizes economic conditions in considering development and other actions at the lake, it surrenders a significant amount of authority long held by TRPA to the two states and the five Nevada and California local governments in the basin.
“The two states have always had differences, and they have always been able to work those differences out,” TRPA Spokesman Jeff Cowen said Wednesday. “The message (the governors) sent is about renewing their commitment and renewing their partnership, and what it shows is that we’re all standing together.”
SB229 sponsor Sen. David Parks, D-Las Vegas, said SB271 of the 2011 session threatening withdrawal did its job, bringing all stakeholders together to develop the new plan.
Kirkpatrick, D-North Las Vegas, said the compromise language in SB229 will help protect “our state and the treasure we have at Lake Tahoe.”
Sen. James Settelmeyer, R-Gardnerville, who pushed for the withdrawal bill two years ago, said he believes the compromise language will help things turn around and that “we will see some gains at Tahoe.”
Conservation and Natural Resources Director Leo Drozdoff told the panel Wednesday that the bistate relationship in cooperatively managing the basin will be stronger with the new regional plan and the commitment of both states to work together.
He said the “added burden” on groups wishing to challenge the plan is important, pointing out that the lawsuit challenging it was filed despite passage of the new plan by a 12-1 margin.
Kyle Davis of the Nevada Conservation League said he was satisfied because the deal mainly removes the threat of disbanding the TRPA from the law.
“We’re thrilled that this compromise has been met; it means the threat of Nevada and the timeline for Nevada pulling out … goes away,” said Darcie Goodman-Collins, executive director of the League to Save Lake Tahoe, on Wednesday. “It’s especially important now that the regional plan has been updated … both states are committed to implementing that plan.”
The measure is expected to easily pass the Assembly Thursday, Kirkpatrick said, and win Senate approval for the amendments in the compromise plan. Sandoval threatened to veto the original version of the bill saying it was too soon to pull back the threat but, since his office helped develop the compromise, he is expected to sign it.
Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., praised both Sandoval and Brown for their work in bringing all parties together on the issue.
“Their agreement will allow the local communities in both states to better manage the lake and conserve its natural splendor and the many species that make their home in the basin,” he said, adding that he will work to win congressional approval of the regional plan backed by the two states.
On Wednesday, Laurel Ames, spokeswoman for the Tahoe Area Sierra Club, said she had yet to fully assess the amended SB229, although when asked her thoughts on Lake Tahoe’s future, she said, “the best solution would be a vastly improved regional plan.”
TRPA was created by California and Nevada and sanctified by Congress in 1969. It puts major environmental and development decisions in the hands of the bistate board requiring a majority of both states’ members for approval.
Bonanza Editor Kevin MacMillan contributed to this report.
Trending In: Environment
- E. coli, coliform bacteria found in Squaw Valley drinking water at upper mountain
- Tree removal planned in Tahoe City for Fanny Bridge project
- Restoration group forms to improve Lake Tahoe’s West Shore
- Squaw Valley issues statement on upper mountain water quality
- Placer supes to vote next week on North Tahoe community plan
- Truckee Bank of America armed robbery: Second suspect arrested
- Tahoe under the surface: Photographer dives deep for underwater shots
- Northstar California appoints Nadia Guerriero as new GM
- Reno real estate: A look back, and a look ahead at the housing market
- ‘Ninja road stars’ piercing tires in South Lake Tahoe (photos)