Lake Tahoe forest plan could imact parking
August 17, 2012
LAKE TAHOE and#8212; Cars lined the Highway 89 corridor by the Camp Richardson Resort as beachgoers made their way to the shore on Tuesday. The area is home to some of the Lake Tahoe Basinand#8217;s most popular beaches, making summer parking, especially on weekends and holidays, a downright battle.
and#8220;After the Fourth, the whole highway was lined with cars,and#8221; said Chris Smart, an employee at the areaand#8217;s information center.
According to U.S. Forest Service spokeswoman Cheva Heck, the roadside parking can be both dangerous and damaging.
Thatand#8217;s why three of the four alternatives in the USFS Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unitand#8217;s Forest Plan update involve looking at better parking management in high-use areas like Camp Richardson and Highway 28 by Sand Harbor.
That management includes building more lots and potentially imposing fees to keep people off the busy roads and curbside areas.
and#8220;There are issues with public safety involved. And the other big issue is resource damage. Obviously developed parking costs money to build and maintain. Thereand#8217;s definitely a possibility there will be fees for parking,and#8221; she said.
Recommended Stories For You
South Shore Snow bike mechanic Mark Coverdale said he already saw an accident on the East Shore by Sand Harbor in July that he describes as parking-related.
and#8220;There was carnage, a tow-truck, and a 25-minute wait. It was an obvious example of a parking-problem area,and#8221; Coverdale said. and#8220;Thereand#8217;s access to lots but theyand#8217;re always full. The whole East Shore corridor is where they should build the lots.and#8221;
And though Coverdale and#8212; an avid mountain biker and skier and#8212; would rather not pay for parking to access the backcountry, itand#8217;s better than no parking at all, he said.
The Forest Serviceand#8217;s preferred option, Alternative B, would attempt to substitute roadside parking for managed parking, such as lots. Parking capacity would remain the same. Alternative C would increase parking capacity, while Alternative D would decrease it, placing more emphasis on other forms of transit. Under Alternative A, no changes would take place.
All public comments regarding the proposed Forest Plan are due by Aug. 30. The final environmental document should be released by late 2012, with a decision by the Forest Serviceand#8217;s regional office scheduled for the middle of 2013. It will mark the end of an almost 10-year process to revise the plan, Heck said.
and#8220;Weand#8217;ve put a lot of work into it and weand#8217;re happy to be close to the finish line,and#8221; she said.
More information on the plan is available by calling Matt Dickinson at 530-543-2683 or Denise Downie at 530-543-2769.
Documents related to the plan can be found at http://tinyurl.com/tahoeforestplan.