Pine Nuts: A 21st century amendment
Much better minds than mine have examined this issue, yet sometimes it proves helpful for a regular Mae, or in this case a regular Mac, to look with fresh eyes at a thorny issue and report her or his findings.
So let’s take a look at the Second Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
At first glance I had to believe our Framers surely must have meant to say, “the right of the people to keep and bear a Coat of Arms, shall not be infringed.”
But when I mentioned this possibility to a retired professor friend, he only laughed out loud. So I have been moved to examine the matter further.
The first clause, the precondition, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,” establishes the reason and purpose for the second clause, “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
In 1791, we did not have a well-regulated militia but we do now. We spend more than a billion dollars a day to regulate a National Guard, Air Force, Army, Navy, Marine Corps and CIA. The emergence of a well-regulated militia has effectively nullified the need and purpose of the people to keep and bear Arms.
A similarly constructed amendment, an amendment to protect us from constipation lets say, would read, “A well regulated morning constitutional, being necessary to the health of an individual, the right of the people to keep and bear blasting powder shall not be infringed.”
At bottom, individuals carrying automatic weapons do not represent a well-regulated militia, to the contrary they represent an unregulated militia, and an unregulated militia has inadvertently, accidentally and regretfully created our horrific domestic terror epidemic.
An AR-556 with a 30-round magazine is not protected by the Second Amendment; it did not exist in 1791, and if it had existed it would have been, well — regulated.
Thus, I humbly submit here, a 28th Amendment to bring the 2nd Amendment into the 21st century. And what should such a 28th Amendment say, anyway? To my mind it is very straightforward.
“The second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed. Henceforth, the right of the people to keep and bear single shot arms shall not be infringed.”
I’m not a constitutional lawyer, I pray God will not make me a constitutional lawyer; I’m an average citizen with an average sense of rectitude. We can’t prevent every attempt to kill with a gun, but we can diminish the resulting carnage, and a 21st century 28th Amendment could do exactly that.
Learn more about McAvoy Layne at http://www.ghostoftwain.com.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Lake Tahoe, Truckee, and beyond make the Sierra Sun's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User