My Turn: Vote ‘no’ on Measure J |

My Turn: Vote ‘no’ on Measure J

TRUCKEE, Calif. — The proponents of Measure J urge the taxpayers to vote on a bond measure based upon good faith and economic timing. Board member Kevin Murphy and some proponents have said that the Truckee Donner Recreation and Parks District “is committing $7 million in savings banked from the strong financial management of the TDRPD Community Center project…”Where did the $7.2M in funds come from? In 2007 the TDRPD issued Certificates of Participation (loosely referred to as a bond) in the amount of $25 million, payable for 30 years, fixed, at 4.8 percent interest payable at $1.5M interest and principal annually. The funds are for Phase I and Phase II of the Community Center. Phase I was built, the residual funds of $7.2M have been and are being held in a restricted capital projects account for Phase II since that time. The $7.2 million is borrowed money from CP proceeds and not the result of good management. It costs the taxpayer about $450,000 annually for interest and principal.As for good management, a 2011 independent audit by a CPA firm referenced in the district’s end-of-year financial statements disclosed the TDRPD had $462,622 less cash and investments on hand than from 2010. “This is largely the result of reduced revenues which are not adequate to fund operating expenditures and debt payments.” The important point here is that the District is operating in the red due to operating expenses and debt payments.Furthermore, the 2010 independent audit by a CPA firm contains 8 pages of appendices, A & B, which describe in detail the “Material Weaknesses” and “Significant Deficiencies” in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Accounting errors and lack of senior management policies and procedures including a lack such routine procedures as a purchase order system were among the reasons discussed.They noted “The capital outlay accounts contained millions of dollars in errors, including multi-million dollar negative balances.” The auditor went so far to state that “…capital outlay balances in the financial statements were erroneous by millions of dollars. Initial expenditures were scattered into multiple expense accounts… The accounting staff did not understand the cost of the new facility.”It is not the mission of the TDRPD to expand the economic base of Truckee. The District needs time to get its house and finances in order before embarking on additional capital projects.While we are all hurting from the national economic downturn, promises of wonderful economic benefits are just not likely or deliverable. Hired consultants tend to satisfy the customer and all too often projects result in either unmet expectations or significantly adverse consequences of spending too much of the public’s money. Please join me in demanding more accountability and transparency in our government and vote no on Measure J.Patty Lomanto is a Truckee resident and member of the Truckee Tahoe League of Women Voters.

Support Local Journalism


Support Local Journalism

Readers around Lake Tahoe, Truckee, and beyond make the Sierra Sun's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


History: How Southern Pacific saved Lake Tahoe


In the early 1900s, few people would have accused the Southern Pacific Corporation of acting in the public interest, much less of working to preserve the natural environment. The much more popular view was that…

See more