Sierra Sun editorial: Keep Tahoe hypocritical? | SierraSun.com

Sierra Sun editorial: Keep Tahoe hypocritical?

The League to Save Lake Tahoe has a lot of explaining to do.

For the past five years itand#8217;s hosted an annual Oscar de la Renta fashion show at the Fritz estate on Lake Tahoeand#8217;s west shore. The event and#8212; held for almost 40 years and#8212; has raised anywhere between $250,000 and $500,000 a year for the organization.

Meanwhile, for the past three years, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency has been chasing property owner Tamara Fritz, trying to resolve multiple code infractions including an illegal expansion of Fritzand#8217;s pier and unauthorized installation of additional boating facilities and#8212; specifically a second boat lift.

For most of the time TRPA was issuing multiple cease and desist orders against Fritz, the League and Sierra Club were suing the agency to require additional protection for Lake Tahoe before allowing any more piers, buoys and boat facilities along its shorezone.

In September 2010, when a federal judge ruled in favor of the League and Sierra Club regarding the limited expansion of piers and boat facilities, Fritzand#8217;s illegally expanded pier and unauthorized boat facilities were already built. TRPA staff recorded them in July of 2010.

And in August of 2010, 640 people paid $350 a head to attend the Leagueand#8217;s annual fundraiser at the property. Thatand#8217;s about $224,000 in the Leagueand#8217;s coffers to support its mission of and#8220;protecting, restoring, and advocating for the ecosystem health and scenic beauty of the Lake Tahoe Basin.and#8221;

Whether or not Fritz willfully ignored TRPA regulations regarding new shorezone structures is not the point. Whether or not the League knew about the illegal construction while profiting from an event hosted at the property is also not the point.

The point is the League, when confronted with the pier expansion, showed no outrage or concern and#8212; an odd stance for an organization with few qualms about voicing outrage and concern in public and in the courts.

Shorezone structures and#8220;disturb fisheries and vegetation, create visual clutter along the shoreline, increase the risk of invasive species introduction, promote algal growth, and inhibit public access to and along the Lake,and#8221; according to the League and Sierra Club suit.

The suit makes no mention of how shorezone structures also provide an excellent backdrop for fashion shows few locals are able to afford.

Instead of showing concern over the pier expansion, Executive Director Rochelle Nason defended Fritz, saying she had and#8220;done a great deal for Lake Tahoe and for the arts at Lake Tahoe.and#8221;

If thatand#8217;s the going rate to justify illegal construction at Lake Tahoe, then the arts may see a rash of interest from local developers and lakefront owners.

Or, maybe thatand#8217;s the going rate to earn the support of an organization that loudly proclaims it is only interested in what is best to and#8220;Keep Tahoe Blue.and#8221;

In this instance, it seems the League is most interested in whatand#8217;s best for its bottom line and for those who can afford to buy its support.

Perhaps the organization should change its slogan to and#8220;Keep Tahoe Elitist (and Hypocritical).and#8221;




News


See more