Law Review: Parents of teen killed at railroad crossing sue Union Pacific |

Law Review: Parents of teen killed at railroad crossing sue Union Pacific


This is a sad case. It involves a sixteen-year-old girl who was struck and killed by a freight train on an at-grade railroad crossing in Santa Clarita.


Kimberly Jimenez-Soto routinely walked along an unpaved path (wearing earphones which we learned from the Opinion) near Soledad Canyon to Santa Clarita to get to her school bus stop. To get to the bus stop it is necessary to traverse an at-grade railroad crossing. On the morning of Nov. 7, 2014, Soto and other children took the regular route to the bus stop, and everyone but Soto stopped – with the bells, whistles, flashing lights and automatic lever blocking vehicular traffic all working and activated indicating the approach of an oncoming train. With her head down, Soto walked into the intersection and was immediately struck and killed.


Soto’s parents sued Union Pacific, the freight train conductor and the engineer for premises liability and negligence.

Union Pacific put into evidence the railway line and crossing improvements were owned by Southern California Regional Rail Authority dba Metrolink. Compelling evidence it would seem to me.

The evidence showed the train was traveling at 44 mph, under the speed limit, and all safety systems were operating, including the warning horn sequence which commenced 18 seconds prior to the train’s arrival at the crossing.

Video of the train showed Soto was visible only 1.2 seconds prior to impact. The emergency brakes were immediately implemented and the train stopped approximately 32 seconds later a little over 1,000 feet down the line.

The young girl’s parents’ attorneys put on evidence that Union Pacific should have added a pedestrian crossing at the intersection.


The trial court ruled for Union Pacific and the teenager’s heartbroken parents appealed. How would you rule?

The Second District Court of Appeal upheld the trial court finding that Union Pacific was not the owner of the crossing improvements and the conductor and engineer were not negligent and had indeed done everything possible to avoid the accident.

A line in the court of appeal Opinion says it all: “Although we cannot overstate the tragic scope of Soto’s loss, based on the evidence and governing law, we affirm [the trial court ruling for Union Pacific].” So sad. So avoidable.

The lesson here: don’t walk the railroad tracks with headphones on.

Jim Porter is an attorney with Porter Simon licensed in California and Nevada, with offices in Truckee and Tahoe City, California, and Reno, Nevada. Jim’s practice areas include: real estate, development, construction, business, HOAs, contracts, personal injury, accidents, mediation and other transactional matters. He may be reached at or

Support Local Journalism


Support Local Journalism

Readers around Lake Tahoe, Truckee, and beyond make the Sierra Sun's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User