Revenooer Rants: Some IRA early distributions escape penalty
Special to the Bonanza
Generally speaking, distributions from IRAs before one reaches age 59-1/2 trigger a penalty for early withdrawal — the Revenooers want you to keep the dough in the account until you are truly long in the tooth and truly need the money to support yourself in retirement.
But for any number of reasons, a bloke may take the money out early without the imposition of the IRS fine. Some of the permissible early withdrawal situations are:
After the death of the participant (We guess the Revenooers are just being reasonable, here, figuring that you can’t take it with you, so why not allow distributions.)
Total and permanent disability of the participant.
To enable the participant to pay for qualified higher education expenses.
To allow a “qualified first time homebuyer” to get into that new abode (up to $10,000).
To pay for unreimbursed medical expenses.
To pay for health insurance premiums while unemployed.
So, be advised, when you receive that 1099 (which also goes to IRS) reporting your IRA withdrawals last year, if you’re below the magic age.
And here’s an interesting recent decision from the Tax Court. A lady who donated her eggs for use by infertile couples received $20,000 from an egg donor facilitator, who also issued the taxpayer a 1099 reporting the payment.
She chose not to report the sum as income, however, on the theory that the payments were legitimately excludable under the Internal Revenue Code, which does have a provision allowing taxpayers to avoid tax on amounts received in exchange for “pain and suffering,” (endured during the lengthy egg retrieval process in this case).
“No way,” concluded the Tax Court (after the IRS got on our gal’s case), reasoning that because the egg donor voluntarily signed a contract to be paid to endure the medical procedures, the amounts she received were not excludable damages. Instead, the dollars constituted compensation for services, and were thus includable in gross income.
And finally this week — another recent case, allowing a mortgage interest deduction to a chap who didn’t actually hold title to the hostel in question.
He was, though, operating under an oral agreement to purchase the property from some family members. Although he didn’t hold legal title, nor did his name appear on the mortgage, the Tax Court concluded that he was an “equitable owner” because he paid the mortgage, taxes and insurance on the property.
This concept of “equitable” ownership is specifically sanctioned by the IRS’ own regulations.
CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISER – This article contains general information about various tax matters. You should consult your CPA regarding the implications to your own particular situation. Jeff Quinn is a shareholder in Ashley Quinn, CPAs and Consultants, Ltd., with offices in Incline Village and Reno. He welcomes comments at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Lake Tahoe, Truckee, and beyond make the Sierra Sun's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Thanks and kudos to the CHP and North Tahoe Fire Protection District for quick response in exterminating a garbage truck fire last Friday. CHP Officer Graham spotted the smoke, notified the TTSD driver and immediately…