Revenooer Rants: What’s wrong, IRS — cat got your tongue?
Seems the Revenooers plan to go silent – they just don’t want to talk to you anymore.
The National Taxpayer Advocate, in her recent report to Congress, notes that for the past year and a half, IRS has devoted significant resources to creating a “future state” plan which details how the agency will operate in five years.
The plan is explained and developed in a document known as a Concept of Operations (CONOPS).
But CONOPS gives the Advocate a bit of heartburn – implicit in the plan (and explicit in internal discussion) is an intention of the part of the Revenooers to substantially reduce telephone and face-to-face interaction with taxpayers.
IRS is hoping that taxpayer interactions with IRS through online accounts will address a high percentage of taxpayer needs. Consider:
• Taxpayers place more than 100 million telephone calls to IRS each year and have done so in every year since fiscal year 2008.
• Taxpayers make more than five million visits to IRS walk-in sites each year.
• Taxpayers send an average of about ten million pieces of correspondence to IRS in response to proposed adjustment notices each year, to which IRS must respond.
Seems the Advocate thinks that if IRS substantially reduces the opportunity for folks to actually talk with IRS employees, many taxpayers will find it much harder to resolve their problems and will have to pay third parties to assist them (No doubt!).
Hence, the Advocate has recommended to Congress that IRS make the CONOPS available for public review and comment (heretofore not done). Indeed, the Advocate has designated the future of taxpayer service (an oxymoron if ever there was one) as the number one most serious problem presently confronting taxpayers.
Quoth the Advocate: “Of considerable concern … is what is not stated in the CONOPS. Nowhere in the CONOPS is there a statement that the IRS plans to reduce telephone service or close walk-in sites, even though that is a central component of its strategy … The widespread expectation is that traditional taxpayer services – telephone assistance and face-to-face assistance – will be scaled back dramatically. Based on our internal discussions with IRS officials, Taxpayer Advocate Service has been left with the distinct impression that the IRS’s ultimate goal is ‘to get out of the business of talking with taxpayers.’”
Who knows – maybe this is a good thing.
And the latest from Hillary, this week: a proposed 4 percent “fair share surcharge” tax on the wealthy – now defined as folks making more than $5 million per year.
“This surcharge is a direct way to ensure that effective rates rise for taxpayers who are avoiding paying their fair share, and that the richest Americans pay an effective rate higher than middle-class families,” says a Clinton aide.
We’d call this a “broken record” argument, but who knows what vinyl is any more.
CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISER – This article contains general information about various tax matters. You should consult your CPA regarding the implications to your own particular situation. Jeff Quinn is a CPA recently retired from the firm of Ashley Quinn, CPAs and Consultants, Ltd., with offices in Incline Village and Reno. He welcomes comments at email@example.com.